Technical assessment of registers

18 December 2019

This study was carried out on the initiative of the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine and the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and was implemented under the support of EU Project Pravo-Justice. The main aim of the study was to assess the status of the registries in National Agency of Information Systems (NAIS) under the Ministry of Justice - requirements for the creation, exchange, storage, correction and format of registers data, to identify key data in registers, user groups and data providers, and requirements for access to information in the registers.

Gap Analysis Of Enforcement Legislation

18 December 2019

In 2017 first private enforcement officers (PEOs) started operating. To date some 200 PEOs (and about 300 assistant staff) are operational, having enforced almost 3 times more judgments per case closed, to compare with the State Enforcement Service (SES), whose number of officers represents some 4,500 persons.

Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System Development Strategy

6 December 2019

This document contains initial recommendations on possible further activities for the development of the Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System (UJITS).

Priority legislative changes - enforcement reform

7 November 2019

Ukraine faces an important challenge in the reform of enforcement of court decisions, as a key effort to protect property rights. A successful reform of the enforcement system is relevant to raising the trust of the Ukrainian public and foreign investors in Ukraine as a safe place for owning property and doing business.

Monitoring of Implementation of the Civil and Commercial Procedural Codes - Final Report

11 October 2019

This report is aimed at presenting a methodology for monitoring the implementation of the new Ukrainian Civil and Commercial Procedural Codes. Monitoring was conducted by way of a specifically developed questionnaire with closed answers (Questionnaire A; multiple choice) and an instrument for conducting in-depth interviews (Questionnaire B; open-ended questions). The methodology is not only meant for monitoring the implementation of procedural codes, but also for similar monitoring exercises in the future