Selection and Evaluation of Judges in Ukraine
December 13, 2018
Executive summary
Executive summary
Following the adoption of the Justice Sector Reform Strategy and Action Plan (JSRSAP) in 2015 and the subsequent constitutional amendments in 2016, the process of the systemic judiciary reset includes an obligatory one-off evaluation (“qualification re-assessment”) of the existing judges to confirm their fitness to continue to exercise their judicial duties. The fact that since 2014 - after the introduction of new procedures of qualification re-assessment - almost 3,000 judges resigned (this amounts to at least 30%, as Ukraine had almost 9,000 judges at the start of the judiciary reset) without waiting for the qualification re-assessment, should be considered among key achievements of the reform. The judiciary reset also involves the selection of new judges, and the creation of new courts. In 2017, following constitutional amendments, Ukraine launched a completely new Supreme Court through open competition. The judiciary reset is being continued in 2018 as more than 6,000 judges and candidates are passing through the selection and devaluation processes run by the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ).
Final Report Enforcement – Criminal Justice
Legislative Development Process. May – November 2016
Courts Performance Management