component 2
Judicial reform
EU Project Pravo-Justice Component 2 experts work on various aspects of judiciary reform, provide expert support to judicial authorities, and also contribute to institutional capacity building of judiciary governance and administration bodies. Component 2 team is also involved in judges’ professional development, improving the operations of Ukrainian judiciary and ensuring its resilience in wartime, as well as creating the necessary conditions for national courts to properly consider war crimes cases.
Activity areas:
- Comprehensive support of the Supreme Council of Justice
- Support of the Selection Commission for Competitive Selection of Members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges
- Improving the procedure of candidates selection for the Constitutional Court judge
- Providing consulting and logistical support for courts functionality in wartime
- Analyzing and drawing up recommendations to draft laws and other regulations governing judiciary activities
- Developing the Model Courts Initiative
- Improving the professional development training of judges and court employees
- Increasing the capacity of the national judicial system to consider war crimes cases
Our key partners:
- Supreme Court
- High Council of Justice
- High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
- Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy
- State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
- Council of Judges of Ukraine
- National School of Judges of Ukraine
Component team
Volodymyr Chaban
Judiciary Component Lead
Anna Adamska-Gallant
International Key Expert
Olha Sribniak
Key Expert on Judiciary Reform
Anastasiia Yelina
Project Officer
Related News
Related Results & Reports
Expert Report on the Number of Judges and Human Resource Planning Methodologies
This paper aims to review and assess HR methodologies on the number of judges and court staff elaborated by the SJA and develop respective recommendations
Analysis of the Methodology for Calculating the Number of Judges Needed in Courts and Weighting Judicial Cases
This note provides a short analysis of the draft methodologies for calculating the number of judges and weighting judicial cases based on complexity and workload, developed by the SJA.